Home     Schedules     Rosters     Other Links     Help-FAQ     Contact Us     Our Sponsors     
    Message Forums |  Football  |  Basketball  |  Pro Sports  |  Off Topic  |  Chat Room
MESSAGE FORUMS
Football
Basketball
Pro Sports
Off Topic
Chat Room
OTHER LINKS
Other Site Links
Partner Sites
ACCOUNT INFO
Log In
Log Out
Create Account
Rules-Terms
Netiquette
Contact Us



login | create account

Football Message Board
  Register to Post              
Report Abuse  

Subject: Re: Solely from the info in this story, Hawn has a pretty good legal case.
Posted by: Manhattan Beach on Tue May 13 2008 2:35:09 PM
Message:

so, i am no legal expert in ranch law, but i thought the open range
rule was "fence out" not "fence in"?

so, the guy would have a duty to keep the stock off his land, rather
than the stock owner have a duty to keep the stock penned?

wrong? [note: i live in socal, what do i know? lol]

Current Thread:

  The Buffaloes revenge. Texan charged with 32 counts in massacre near Fairplay  --  Buff_Enuff   Tue May 13 2008 12:04:18 AM
      Solely from the info in this story, Hawn has a pretty good legal case. **  --  PAHIBuff   Tue May 13 2008 12:45:49 PM
          I don't see how. Livestock is treated way differently then wildlife.  --  Buff_Enuff   Tue May 13 2008 2:42:12 PM
          Re: Solely from the info in this story, Hawn has a pretty good legal case.  --  Manhattan Beach   Tue May 13 2008 2:35:09 PM
              It isn't open range. **  --  PAHIBuff   Tue May 13 2008 6:03:14 PM
      Re: The Buffaloes revenge. Texan ...Hang E'm High**   --  Irish Buff   Tue May 13 2008 8:10:38 AM
          I say tie him behind Ralphie V and drag him around during every home game  --  Buff_Enuff   Tue May 13 2008 9:14:41 AM

You must log in before you can post a message.

Netbuffs.com is an independent site and not affiliated with the University of Colorado   -   Copyright © 2006    -    All Rights Reserved